21 Oct 2014
Singh v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2014] NZACC 272
- Court
- District Court
Leave to appeal refused because the challenge did not raise a tenable, general question of law; the case turned on particular facts and established disentitling statutory provisions (s81 1992; s120 1998) prevented entitlement for wilfully self-inflicted injury such that the 1997 decision could not be impliedly revoked absent proof it was made in error, and the Corporation properly relied on s65 to revoke the 2008 entitlements.
- Disentitlement for wilfully self-inflicted injury
- Implied repeal
- Revocation of entitlement under s65
- Leave to appeal