23 Jul 2008
ADEN ELECTRICAL LTD V TEAMTALK LTD CA CA164/2008
- Citation
- openlaw-0eefe250_c8b0_4240_b005_e3bcd491970e.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The application for special leave under s 67 is dismissed because the matter did not meet the required threshold of sufficient importance given the modest sums at stake and the discretionary nature of the costs decision; the timing and terms of the second Calderbank letter meant costs would likely have lain where they fell or been limited, so appellate intervention was not justified.
- Calderbank offers
- Costs discretion
- Leave to appeal (s 67)
- Misrepresentation
- Oral contract