New Zealand Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

New Zealand Case Law

Likelihood of deception or confusion under s 17(1)(a)
  • 25 May 2012

    NUTRAMARKS, INC. V NATURE'S LIFE NZ LTD HC AK CIV 2011-485-002448

    Citation
    openlaw-b92ecf75_c091_4353_a5f9_b9372e0df21f.pdf
    Court
    High Court

    Nutramarks failed to discharge its evidential onus to prove awareness of its NATURE'S LIFE marks in the defined specialised New Zealand market at the relevant date because sales evidence was not shown in context and was negligible; on that basis the Assistant Commissioner's decision upholding registration of Nature's Life's mark was correct; alternatively, even if awareness were established, the marks and goods/markets are sufficiently different that use of the Nature's Life mark would not be likely to deceive or cause confusion.

    • Likelihood of deception or confusion under s 17(1)(a)
    • Market awareness/reputation threshold
    • Market definition
    • Burden and standard of proof
    • Comparison of marks