New Zealand Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

New Zealand Case Law

Oral evidence in habeas proceedings
  • 8 Nov 2011

    MISIUK V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & ORS HC AK CIV-2011-404-006821

    Citation
    openlaw-37883e5b_27eb_48e8_9cfc_c4b96de8863f.pdf
    Court
    High Court

    Applicant is lawfully detained under a current warrant of committal dated 18 April 2011 for a four year sentence; the habeas corpus procedure is unsuitable to relitigate convictions and convictions must be challenged by appeal or judicial review; interlocutory relief, oral evidence and a jury trial were not justified under the Act or practice, therefore the habeas corpus application is dismissed and interim relief denied.

    • Habeas corpus
    • Interim release (s11)
    • Lawfulness of detention
    • Costs
    • Jurisdictional limits of habeas corpus
    • Oral evidence in habeas proceedings