13 Jun 2011
KIM V THE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY HC AK CIV 2011-404-000065
- Citation
- openlaw-452aa616_4a5b_443a_971c_89bb0972e8a5.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The adjudicator lawfully exercised her statutory discretion, considered all relevant evidence (both original and later supervisor evaluations, references, TESL certificate and mentoring statements), did not act with bias or procedural unfairness, and reached a reasonable evaluative conclusion within the scope of the Legal Services Act 2000 that the applicant did not meet the criteria for appointment to the duty solicitor roster; judicial review fails.
- Judicial review grounds
- Procedural fairness
- Wednesbury unreasonableness
- Duty solicitor/duty lawyer roster
- Alleged discrimination (abandoned)