9 Nov 2017
Peters v Accident Compensation Corporation (Jurisdictional issue and Entitlements)
- Citation
- [2017] NZACC 134
- Court
- District Court
The reviewer and District Court correctly dismissed the reviews because the 14 July 2014 letter was only a reaffirmation of the 27 March 2013 decision and not a reviewable new decision absent new material; the claimant did not have cover for a treatment injury so no entitlements (including weekly compensation) could follow; and clause 52 Schedule 1 precluded weekly compensation after 1 January 2008.
- Treatment injury
- Weekly compensation
- Reviewability
- Eligibility
- Effect of new zealand superannuation
- Clause 52 schedule 1