30 May 2011
Anderson v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2011] NZACC 160
- Court
- District Court
The Reviewer's and Judge's interim view endorses ACC's conclusion that, on the evidence available at the time, the need for a powered wheelchair stemmed from the claimant's pre-existing multiple sclerosis (and age-related deterioration in upper limb strength) rather than being a direct consequence of the covered injuries; therefore ACC's decision to decline funding for a replacement vehicle was not shown to be flawed, but given subsequent change in facts a prompt new transport-for-independence assessment should be conducted and the hearing is adjourned pending that assessment.
- Entitlement to transport for independence
- Assessment under s.84
- Causation - direct consequence
- Pre-existing condition (multiple sclerosis)
- Adjournment and procedural directions