13 Sept 2016
Strickland v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2016] NZACC 258
- Court
- District Court
The 1 November 2012 letter did not constitute a decision under s6; the subsequent claim merely duplicated an earlier claim dismissed for lack of injury and raised only factual issues; extenuating circumstances are a factual assessment and were not established; therefore no question of law arose and leave to appeal was dismissed.
- Treatment injury
- Medical misadventure
- Duplicative claim
- Definition of decision
- Late review and extenuating circumstances
- Factual vs legal questions