30 Mar 2012
Li v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2012] NZACC 112
- Court
- District Court
The respondent properly declined to fund the Diploma because the evidence showed the appellant already possessed sufficient transferable skills and medically sustainable capacity for identified work-types, so additional training was not appropriate under s87(1)(c) and s80 and funding was not warranted.
- Vocational rehabilitation funding
- Eligibility for training funding
- Interpretation of s87(1)(c) and s80