22 Mar 2016
LIM v MEDICAL COUNCIL OF NEW ZEALAND [2016] NZHC 485
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 485
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal refused because the proposed grounds do not raise questions of law of general or public importance and there is no real risk of miscarriage of justice; the District Court correctly applied the Austin Nichols approach, its factual conclusions about sedation were open on the evidence, and any procedural error did not oblige allowance of the appeal.
- Interim suspension of practising certificate
- Practitioner discipline
- Natural justice (notice and hearing)
- Standard of appellate review (austin nichols)
- Leave to appeal
- Name suppression