New Zealand Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

New Zealand Case Law

Share-backed versus contract supply
  • 1 Dec 2015

    MACINTYRE AND WILLIAMSON PARTNERSHIP v FONTERRA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED [2015] NZHC 3012

    Citation
    [2015] NZHC 3012
    Court
    High Court

    The Court held plaintiffs were new entrants for s106 purposes once issued shares; Fonterra breached s106 by imposing objectively unjustified inferior terms (price discount and sharing-up prohibition) aimed at internal 'optics' rather than legitimate objective differences; Fonterra's statements at meetings that suppliers could not share-up and that other shareholders could not obtain shares were, in context and as to their effect, misleading in trade (FTA s9) and constituted actionable misrepresentations under CRA s6; causation and damages reserved.

    • Dairy industry restructuring act s106 (non-discrimination)
    • New entrant/shareholding farmer status
    • Share-backed versus contract supply
    • Misleading and deceptive conduct (fta s9)
    • Misrepresentation (cra s6)
    • Statutory interpretation of dira