Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Qatar decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court held SDI Sports LLC wrongfully repudiated Patricia Jaecklein’s contract and awarded damages, moral damages, interest, costs, and a declaration on restrictive covenants.
The Appellate Division held that Mr El-Emadi’s preferential employee claim in the Horizon Crescent liquidation was capped at QAR 182,000 under article 148(1).
Abdulrahman Al-Rayyan v Tricion Doha QFC Branch [2026] QIC (F) 3 (11 February 2026)
The court found that the respondent failed to provide sufficient evidence of lawful grounds for termination, rendering the dismissal wrongful under QFC regulations.
Source excerpt
The Court refused Tricion’s disclosure application in an employment dispute, holding the requested documents were not material, too broad, or aimed at credibility issues.
Nabila Kesraoui v MBG Corporate Services LLC [2025] QIC (F) 18 (23 March 2025)
The court found that the respondent failed to provide valid grounds for dismissal and did not comply with statutory requirements, rendering the dismissal unfair and entitling the applicant to compensation.
Source excerpt
Claire Holloway vs MBG Corporate Services LLC [2025] QIC (F) 19 (23 March 2025)
The court found that MBG Corporate Services LLC failed to provide sufficient evidence of valid cause for termination and breached the employment contract, entitling Claire Holloway to compensation.
Source excerpt
Waqar Zaman v Meinhardt BIM Studios LLC and Meinhardt (Singapore) Pte [2025] QIC (C) 5 (20 March 2025)
The court held that the termination was unlawful due to failure to provide adequate notice as required by the employment contract and Qatari law.
Source excerpt
The Registrar assessed the Claimant’s costs at QAR 17,100 for the first-instance proceedings and refused a pro bono costs order on appeal.
Akhil Balakrishnan Tharippayil v Ginger Camel LLC [2025] QIC (F) 13 (23 February 2025)
The court found that the respondent failed to provide a valid reason for dismissal and did not follow proper procedure, entitling the applicant to compensation.
Source excerpt
The Court enforced a settlement agreement and ordered the defendant to pay USD 1,000, plus 5% interest from 5 December 2024 and reasonable costs.
Explore more
