AB BANK RWANDA PLC v. EDECON CONSULTANTS LTD

AB BANK RWANDA PLC v. EDECON CONSULTANTS LTD

The Court of Appeal found that both the Commercial Court and the High Commercial Court decided the dispute on the same grounds—namely, the enforceability and interpretation of the 27/10/2021 settlement agreement, which fixed the debt at 85,038,281.23 Frw and did not authorize the collection of additional amounts....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 00086/2024/CA
Parties
Appellant: AB BANK RWANDA PLC; Respondent: EDECON CONSULTANTS LTD
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 March 2025
Case Number
RCOMAA 00086/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Second Appeal, Ruling on Jurisdictional Objection
Outcome
Second appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; costs awarded to respondent.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts, Contract Enforcement, Settlement Agreements, Excessive Debt Recovery, Costs and Attorney Fees
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts Contract Enforcement Settlement Agreements Excessive Debt Recovery Costs and Attorney Fees

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AB BANK RWANDA PLC

Appellant

EDECON CONSULTANTS LTD

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Second Appeal, Ruling on Jurisdictional Objection

  1. 1 Whether the second appeal by AB BANK RWANDA PLC is admissible under Article 52(3) of Law No. 30/2018, given that the same grounds were decided in both lower courts;
  2. 2 Whether AB BANK RWANDA PLC was properly ordered to refund excessive amounts collected beyond the agreed settlement;
  3. 3 Entitlement to attorney fees and litigation costs at the appellate level.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that both the Commercial Court and the High Commercial Court decided the dispute on the same grounds—namely, the enforceability and interpretation of the 27/10/2021 settlement agreement, which fixed the debt at 85,038,281.23 Frw and did not authorize the collection of additional amounts. Since both courts provided consistent legal reasoning and outcomes, Article 52(3) of Law No. 30/2018 barred a second appeal. The court also found that EDECON CONSULTANTS LTD was entitled to attorney fees and litigation costs at the appellate level due to the justified objection and necessity of legal counsel.

Court Disposition

Second appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; costs awarded to respondent.

Orders

  • Second appeal by AB BANK RWANDA PLC is not admitted for lack of jurisdiction under Article 52(3) of Law No. 30/2018.
  • AB BANK RWANDA PLC to pay EDECON CONSULTANTS LTD attorney fees of 500,000 Frw and litigation costs of 200,000 Frw at this level.