BUHIRE ET AL v. BRD
The expulsion of appellants from the cooperative does not extinguish their liability under the loan and suretyship contract, as the contract remains binding until the debt is paid or otherwise extinguished according to law. No evidence was provided that the debt was paid or otherwise discharged.
- Citation
- RCOMA 0024/09/CS
- Parties
- Appellant: BUHIRE Etienne; Appellant: KIMENYI Evariste; Respondent: BRD (Rwanda Development Bank); Respondent: COCAF-AMIZERO
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 6 May 2011
- Case Number
- RCOMA 0024/09/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Loan Contract, Suretyship, Guarantee, Expulsion From Cooperative, Mortgage Liability
- Source Language
- en, rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BUHIRE Etienne
Appellant
KIMENYI Evariste
Appellant
BRD (Rwanda Development Bank)
Respondent
COCAF-AMIZERO
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether expulsion from the cooperative relieves appellants of liability under the loan and suretyship contract
Ratio Decidendi
The expulsion of appellants from the cooperative does not extinguish their liability under the loan and suretyship contract, as the contract remains binding until the debt is paid or otherwise extinguished according to law. No evidence was provided that the debt was paid or otherwise discharged.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment of Commercial High Court RCOM 0408/08/HCC confirmed
- Appellants ordered to pay court fees of RWF 39,100
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment