KHALID v. AHMED N’ABANDI
The Supreme Court held that third party opposition is not an admissible remedy against its final judgments, as the law restricts remedies to revision or prerogative of mercy, and extraordinary remedies like third party opposition are prevented by article 84 of the Organic Law.
- Citation
- RC 0002/09/CS
- Parties
- Applicant: Khalid Foz; Respondent: Ahmed Abdulatif; Respondent: Succession Yussuf Bin Abdulaziz; Respondent: Assini Omar; Respondent: Ali Fikirini
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2010
- Case Number
- RC 0002/09/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Third Party Opposition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claim rejected
- Legal Topics
- Third Party Opposition, Supreme Court Jurisdiction, Extraordinary Remedies, Admissibility of Claims
- Source Language
- rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khalid Foz
Applicant
Ahmed Abdulatif
Respondent
Succession Yussuf Bin Abdulaziz
Respondent
Assini Omar
Respondent
Ali Fikirini
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Third Party Opposition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is a third party opposition claim admissible against a Supreme Court judgment under Rwandan law?
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that third party opposition is not an admissible remedy against its final judgments, as the law restricts remedies to revision or prerogative of mercy, and extraordinary remedies like third party opposition are prevented by article 84 of the Organic Law.
Court Disposition
claim rejected
Orders
- Rejects the third party opposition claim initiated by Khalid Foz against judgment RCAA 0006/08/CS.
- Orders Khalid Foz to pay 12,500 Frw of court fees, to be deducted from assets if unpaid within 8 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment