Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal dismissed SANLAM ALLIANZ GI Plc’s appeal, holding that its third-party opposition was filed out of time and could not be admitted.
Article 161, paragraph 4 of Law n0 22/2018 does not contradict articles 15, 29(1)(c), or 34 of the Constitution, as the distinction between courts is based on legitimate jurisdictional grounds and the principle that judicial proceedings must have an end. The provision does not deprive aggrieved parties of remedies, nor does it violate equality, due process, or property rights.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held that Barawumfitiye Vestine’s appeal was a second appeal and inadmissible because it fell outside the court’s jurisdiction under article 52.
The Court of Appeal held that a caveat registered after lawful sale of land could be cancelled, even though transfer had not yet been completed for reasons beyond the seller’s control.
The Supreme Court held that HOME BASKET SACCO could oppose the judgment as a third party, but the Commercial High Court lacked jurisdiction over auction-formality disputes.
The Supreme Court upheld that Home Basket SACCO could oppose the case, but confirmed the Commercial High Court lacked jurisdiction over the auction-formality dispute.
The Supreme Court held that HOME BASKET SACCO could oppose the prior judgment as a third party, but found the auction-formality dispute belonged elsewhere, so Uburiyemuye’s appeal failed.
The Supreme Court held that a third party opposition judgment remained appealable, quashed the Court of Appeal’s dismissal, and upheld the High Court on the enforcement formula issue.
The Supreme Court held that Whitefield’s appeal should have been heard, but upheld the High Court on the enforcement-formula issue and awarded limited costs.
The Supreme Court held that a third party opposition requires an interest distinct from the parties’ interests. It quashed the Intermediate Court judgment and restored the prior decision.
Explore more
