UBUSHINJACYAHA v NKUNDABOSE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NKUNDABOSE

Nkundabose failed to provide credible evidence of irresistible duress that would exonerate him from criminal liability for membership in a terrorist organization. His prolonged voluntary participation, acceptance of military training, and assumption of responsibilities within the FDLR negate the claim of coercion. The sentence of 15 years' imprisonment is within the legal range and justified by the facts and law.

Citation
RPA/GEN 00002/2021/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant/accused: Nkundabose Sébastien
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
16 January 2026
Case Number
RPA/GEN 00002/2021/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court Special Chamber for International and Cross Border Crimes
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
Legal Topics
Membership in Terrorist Organization, Duress as Defense, Sentencing, Appeals Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Counter Terrorism Membership in Terrorist Organization Duress as Defense Sentencing Appeals Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Nkundabose Sébastien

Appellant/accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court Special Chamber for International and Cross Border Crimes

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in convicting Nkundabose Sébastien for membership in a terrorist organization despite his claim of duress
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed was proportionate to the acts committed

Ratio Decidendi

Nkundabose failed to provide credible evidence of irresistible duress that would exonerate him from criminal liability for membership in a terrorist organization. His prolonged voluntary participation, acceptance of military training, and assumption of responsibilities within the FDLR negate the claim of coercion. The sentence of 15 years' imprisonment is within the legal range and justified by the facts and law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal of Nkundabose Sébastien is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The High Court's judgment and the 15-year imprisonment sentence remain unchanged.