SHAW N’ABANDI v KAZINA

SHAW N’ABANDI v KAZINA

The court held that Rwandan courts had jurisdiction as the relevant agreements were unsigned and not binding; Kazina Balimba Joseph was not a registered shareholder in either LAKESIDE FISH FARM LLC or LAKESIDE Ltd; the funds transferred were not applied as agreed and thus must be refunded with interest; and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 00035/2024/CA
Parties
Appellant: Roger Martyn Shaw; Appellant: Faith Idamange Shaw; Appellant: LAKESIDE Ltd; Respondent: Kazina Balimba Joseph
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 March 2025
Case Number
RCOMAA 00035/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
partially allowed
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Corporate Veil Piercing, Shareholder Rights, Contractual Remedies, Appeal Procedure, Evidence Assessment, Damages and Interest
Source Language
rw
Commercial Law Contract Law Company Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Corporate Veil Piercing Shareholder Rights Contractual Remedies +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roger Martyn Shaw

Appellant

Faith Idamange Shaw

Appellant

LAKESIDE Ltd

Appellant

Kazina Balimba Joseph

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Rwandan courts had jurisdiction over the dispute given alleged forum selection for US courts
  2. 2 Whether Kazina Balimba Joseph was a shareholder in LAKESIDE FISH FARM LLC or LAKESIDE Ltd
  3. 3 Whether the funds transferred constituted a loan, investment, or share purchase

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Rwandan courts had jurisdiction as the relevant agreements were unsigned and not binding; Kazina Balimba Joseph was not a registered shareholder in either LAKESIDE FISH FARM LLC or LAKESIDE Ltd; the funds transferred were not applied as agreed and thus must be refunded with interest; and the individuals and company were jointly liable as they received and misused the funds. Interest was recalculated to run from the date of demand at the prevailing lending rate.

Court Disposition

partially allowed

Orders

  • Appellants' appeal partially allowed only as to recalculation of interest period and rate.
  • Order for Roger Martyn Shaw, Faith Idamange Shaw, and LAKESIDE Ltd to jointly pay Kazina Balimba Joseph 80,000 USD plus interest of 51,291 USD calculated at 15.94% per annum from 13/03/2021 to 21/03/2025.