UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NGEZENUBWO

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NGEZENUBWO

Given the large quantity of cannabis, defendant's own admissions, and corroborating witness testimony, the conviction for trafficking stands. Mitigating circumstances (first offense, disability) justify reducing the sentence to the statutory minimum of 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 FRW, but not below that. Suspension of the fine is denied due to the gravity of the offense.

Citation
RPAA 00809/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Ngezenubwo Dany
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
27 March 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00809/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed in part, sentence varied
Legal Topics
Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Ngezenubwo Dany

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the conviction should be for drug trafficking or mere possession
  2. 2 Whether sentence and fine should be reduced or suspended

Ratio Decidendi

Given the large quantity of cannabis, defendant's own admissions, and corroborating witness testimony, the conviction for trafficking stands. Mitigating circumstances (first offense, disability) justify reducing the sentence to the statutory minimum of 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 FRW, but not below that. Suspension of the fine is denied due to the gravity of the offense.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed in part, sentence varied

Orders

  • Conviction for drug trafficking affirmed
  • Sentence reduced to 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 FRW