UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NGEZENUBWO
Given the large quantity of cannabis, defendant's own admissions, and corroborating witness testimony, the conviction for trafficking stands. Mitigating circumstances (first offense, disability) justify reducing the sentence to the statutory minimum of 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 FRW, but not below that. Suspension of the fine is denied due to the gravity of the offense.
- Citation
- RPAA 00809/2024/CA
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Ngezenubwo Dany
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2025
- Case Number
- RPAA 00809/2024/CA
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in part, sentence varied
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Ngezenubwo Dany
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction should be for drug trafficking or mere possession
- 2 Whether sentence and fine should be reduced or suspended
Ratio Decidendi
Given the large quantity of cannabis, defendant's own admissions, and corroborating witness testimony, the conviction for trafficking stands. Mitigating circumstances (first offense, disability) justify reducing the sentence to the statutory minimum of 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 FRW, but not below that. Suspension of the fine is denied due to the gravity of the offense.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in part, sentence varied
Orders
- Conviction for drug trafficking affirmed
- Sentence reduced to 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 FRW
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment