UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NYIRAMUGISHA
The appellant was found transporting 1,494 wraps of cannabis from Rubavu to Nyanza for payment, which constitutes trafficking under Rwandan law. The sentence of 20 years imprisonment and a fine of 10,000,000 RWF is proportionate given the scale of the offence and prior reductions. No further reduction is justified.
- Citation
- RPAA00122/2024/CA
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant/accused: Nyiramugisha Angélique
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2024
- Case Number
- RPAA00122/2024/CA
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure, Interpretation of Criminal Statutes
- Source Language
- rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Nyiramugisha Angélique
Appellant/accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be convicted of trafficking or mere possession of narcotics
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive and should be reduced
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was found transporting 1,494 wraps of cannabis from Rubavu to Nyanza for payment, which constitutes trafficking under Rwandan law. The sentence of 20 years imprisonment and a fine of 10,000,000 RWF is proportionate given the scale of the offence and prior reductions. No further reduction is justified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
Orders
- The appeal of Nyiramugisha Angélique is dismissed.
- The conviction for trafficking in narcotics (cannabis) is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment