Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law RLR V.1-2025

PROSECUTION v TWAGIRAYEZU

The Court of Appeal overturned an acquittal, rejected the alibi, and convicted Twagirayezu of genocide and extermination as a crime against humanity.

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Evidence
  • Alibi
  • Witness testimony
  • Burden of proof
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00664/2021/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA VS LIBAKWE N’ABANDI

The court found that all appellants were properly convicted based on corroborated evidence, including confessions, witness statements, and physical evidence. Alibi and defence rights were respected, and confessions in investigation were valid unless proven coerced, which appellants failed to show. Mitigating circumstances were not established. Sentences of life imprisonment and fines were appropriate under the law.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Drug possession
  • Evidence
  • Right to defence
  • Alibi
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law

IMIRONGO CoA - No 4 -December 2022- January 2023

Court of Appeal precedent compilation summarizing sentencing, appeals, evidence, and criminal-law holdings from multiple Rwanda appellate cases.

  • Sexual offences
  • Homicide
  • Assault
  • Organized crime
  • Infanticide
  • Illicit enrichment
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA/GEN 00004/2020/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v BIRINDABAGABO

The Court of Appeal dismissed Birindabagabo Jean Paul’s appeal, upheld his conviction for genocide and crimes against humanity, and found his alibi and duress claims unpersuasive.

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Evidence
  • Alibi
  • Appeals
  • Burden of proof
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 0211/ 10/ CS

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MBARIMOMBAZI

The Supreme Court of Rwanda acquitted the accused of defilement of a minor, finding the prosecution failed to rebut his alibi and the evidence raised doubt.

  • Defilement of a minor
  • Standard of proof
  • Benefit of doubt
  • Alibi
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA0041/10/CS

UBUHSINJYACYAHA v BIMENYIMANA

The Supreme Court acquitted Bimenyimana Jean-Claude after finding the prosecution failed to disprove his alibi and prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

  • Alibi
  • Standard of proof
  • Benefit of doubt
  • Evidence assessment
  • Criminal-procedure
  • Burden-of-proof
Read case analysis
International criminal law

The Prosecutor v. Casimir Bizimungu and others

Trial Chamber II in the Bizimungu et al. case addressed disclosure, notice, counsel, delay, alibi, witness credibility, and several genocide-related allegations.

  • Arrest and detention
  • Notification of charges
  • Right to counsel
  • Initial appearance
  • Undue delay
  • Notice in indictment
Read case analysis
International criminal law ICTR-05-88-A

KALIMANZIRA v. THE PROSECUTOR (APPEAL JUDGMENT)

The Appeals Chamber found that several convictions were unsafe due to insufficient notice, lack of credible evidence, or legal errors regarding the public nature of incitement. Only the conviction for aiding and abetting genocide at Kabuye hill was upheld, as the evidence established substantial contribution and knowledge of genocidal intent. The sentence was reduced to reflect the reversal of most convictions.

  • Genocide
  • Aiding and abetting
  • Instigation
  • Direct and public incitement
  • Fair trial rights
  • Disclosure obligations
Read case analysis
International criminal law ICTR-05-88-T

THE PROSECUTOR V. CALLIXTE KALIMANZIRA (TRIAL JUDGMENT)

The Chamber found that the Prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that Callixte Kalimanzira was individually criminally responsible for genocide and direct and public incitement to commit genocide, based on his acts of aiding, abetting, and instigating killings of Tutsis, his presence and tacit approval at key meetings, and his direct and public incitement at roadblocks and public gatherings. The Chamber found the accused's alibi and challenges to witness credibility unconvincing and determined that procedural defects did not materially prejudice the defence. The Chamber dismissed the cou…

  • Genocide
  • Complicity in genocide
  • Direct and public incitement to commit genocide
  • Criminal responsibility
  • Evidentiary issues
  • Disclosure violations
Read case analysis
International criminal law ICTR-99-54A-T

THE PROSECUTOR V. JEAN DE DIEU KAMUHANDA

ICTR Trial Chamber II convicted Jean de Dieu Kamuhanda of genocide and extermination for his role in the Gikomero killings, while acquitting him on other counts.

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • War crimes
  • Command responsibility
  • Evidentiary standards
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.