Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law

THE PROSECUTION v TWAGIRAYEZU WENCESLAS

The High Court accepted the accused’s alibi for 7–9 April 1994, found prosecution witnesses unreliable because of major contradictions, and acquitted TWAGIRAYEZU Wenceslas.

  • Defence of alibi
  • Evaluation of testimonial evidence
  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Credibility of witnesses
  • Burden of proof
Read case analysis
International criminal law

Callixte Nzabonimana v. The Prosecutor

The Appeals Chamber partly allowed Nzabonimana’s appeal, reversing convictions tied to Murambi and Tambwe but otherwise upholding the Trial Chamber and life sentence.

  • Direct and public incitement to commit genocide
  • Conspiracy to commit genocide
  • Instigation of genocide
  • Extermination as a crime against humanity
  • Aiding and abetting
  • Notice in the indictment
Read case analysis
International criminal law

The Prosecutor v. Callixte Nzabonimana

ICTR Trial Chamber judgment in The Prosecutor v. Callixte Nzabonimana, addressing indictment notice, disclosure, alibi, witness credibility, and genocide-related allegations.

  • Genocide
  • Conspiracy to commit genocide
  • Direct and public incitement to commit genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Extermination
  • Murder
Read case analysis
International criminal law

The Prosecutor v. Casimir Bizimungu and others

Trial Chamber II in the Bizimungu et al. case addressed disclosure, notice, counsel, delay, alibi, witness credibility, and several genocide-related allegations.

  • Arrest and detention
  • Notification of charges
  • Right to counsel
  • Initial appearance
  • Undue delay
  • Notice in indictment
Read case analysis
International criminal law

THE PROSECUTOR V. AUGUSTIN DINDILIYIMANA, AUGUSTIN BIZIMUNGU, FRANÇOIS-XAVIER NZUWONEMEYE AND INNOCENT SAGAHUTU

The Chamber found that the Prosecution failed to prove a conspiracy to commit genocide, but proved various individual and superior-responsibility crimes for some Accused on certain incidents, while acquitting them on other allegations; convictions were entered only where the evidence established the charged conduct and, for war crimes, the required nexus to the armed conflict. The Chamber held that Bizimungu’s liability for extermination was limited to the Josephite Brothers compound because the proof concerning the préfecture office and EER in Butare did not reach the scale required for exte…

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • War crimes
  • Superior responsibility
  • Rape
  • Murder
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.