Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Contract law RCOMAA 00035/2024/CA

ROGER MARTYN SHAW N’ABANDI v. KAZINA

The Court of Appeal partly allowed the appeal, confirming restitution of USD 80,000 and damages, but reduced the interest calculation to USD 51,291 from 13 March 2021.

  • Breach of contract
  • Restitution
  • Interest calculation
  • Corporate veil
  • Jurisdiction clauses
  • Commercial-appeal
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMAA 00033/2019/CA

ENTREPRISE DE CONSTRUCTION SEBURIKOKO v. BIA OVERSEAS SA

The Court of Appeal upheld a commercial judgment finding Rwandan courts had jurisdiction and that the appellant failed to prove an insurer had paid the debt.

  • Jurisdiction clauses
  • Loan agreements
  • Burden of proof
  • Insurance payment defenses
  • Commercial-appeal
  • Jurisdiction-clauses
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMA 0031/13/CS

FREIGHT AFRICA BVBA v. BONUS ENTERPRISES Ltd

The Supreme Court held that the transport contract’s jurisdiction clause gave Antwerp courts exclusive jurisdiction, so Rwandan courts lacked jurisdiction.

  • Jurisdiction clauses
  • Enforcement of contracts
  • Damages
  • Transport contracts
  • Contract-jurisdiction
  • Transport-contracts
Read case analysis
Commercial law RLR V.2-2016

GREAT LAKES CEMENT LTD v. DAMCO TANZANIA LTD_144385_en

The Supreme Court upheld Rwandan jurisdiction despite an exclusive London clause, and confirmed contractual interest at 12% per year with adjusted fees.

  • Jurisdiction clauses
  • Carriage contract
  • Interest for delay
  • Enforcement of foreign jurisdiction clauses
  • Advocate's fees
  • Jurisdiction-clauses
Read case analysis
Commercial law RLR V.2-2016

GREAT LAKES CEMENT Ltd v. DAMCO TANZANIA Ltd

The Supreme Court held that the London forum selection clause was unenforceable because neither party nor the dispute had a material connection to England, and the clause was unreasonable under the circumstances. Rwandan courts had jurisdiction as the defendant resided in Rwanda and the contract was performed there. DAMCO Tanzania was entitled to the outstanding debt, contractual interest at 12% per annum, and reasonable attorney fees. Great Lakes Cement's counterclaims were dismissed for lack of merit.

  • Jurisdiction clauses
  • Enforcement of foreign choice of forum
  • Contractual damages
  • Interest on debt
  • Costs and attorney fees
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.