IYAMUREMYE vs. CHINA CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence that he was a permanent employee; the letters and documents submitted did not prove ongoing, regular employment. As such, he was a casual worker and not entitled to the benefits and compensation claimed. The respondent is entitled to legal costs and partial legal fees.
Source excerpt
- Employment contract classification
- Wrongful termination
- Compensation for dismissal
- Procedural fairness in dismissal
- Legal burden of proof in employment status