Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Supreme Court held that SANLAM failed to prove the claimant received notice for a contre-expertise, so the compensation claim was properly admitted and the review was dismissed.
The High Court partly allowed SANLAM’s appeal, setting aside awards for loss of employment, disfigurement, and temporary disability for lack of proof.
The court held that the police accident report was sufficient to establish liability for the accident and that waiting for the outcome of the criminal case was unnecessary. However, damages for medical expenses and travel must be supported by evidence; in the absence of such evidence, the court reduced these awards to amounts determined at its discretion. The court found no double compensation for pain and suffering, distinguishing between different heads of damages.
Source excerpt
The High Court partly allowed Radiant’s appeal, held that liability could be based on the police accident report, and reduced some unproved expenses.
Late notification of the accident does not bar compensation if justified by compelling reasons such as hospitalization. Damages for loss of earning capacity are not awarded without proof of employment. Other damages for case follow-up and transport are justified given the circumstances.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal held Sorwatraco Ltd liable for injuries caused by a faulty vehicle door during unloading, awarded damages, and found the insurer not liable.
The Supreme Court found the State negligent in controlling military weapons and held the State and a soldier jointly liable for the applicant’s injuries.
Explore more
