Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The appeal was not admissible because it was filed outside the three working day period required for appeals in urgent proceedings concerning confirmation of commercial debts and conversion of provisional seizure to execution, as stipulated by the relevant procedural law.
Source excerpt
The High Court upheld refusal to provisionally seize property, finding no proven urgency or evidence of dissipation. It awarded Boumedienne Abdallah costs.
The Commercial High Court declared Robert Sussman’s ex parte application inadmissible because a related exequatur claim was already pending before the same court.
The Commercial High Court rejected Robert Sussman’s ex parte application for provisional seizure, holding he had to seek such relief within the pending exequatur case.
The Supreme Court held that CAF Isonga’s summary procedure for provisional seizure was inadmissible because it was unrelated to the principal suit pending before it.
The Supreme Court dismissed RWEMA’s urgent application for provisional seizure and valuation of items, holding such relief was unavailable after final judgment.
Explore more
