Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal held that an urgent application filed by a respondent in an appeal was inadmissible because the respondent had no substantive claim before the court.
The Court of Appeal held that a registrar’s refusal to register a claim was provisional, and BPR Plc was liable for releasing seized funds before the process ended.
The High Court upheld dismissal of Ndizeye Martin Patrick’s urgent application, holding that the dispute lacked the urgency required for summary relief.
The Commercial High Court found the plaintiff lacked current legal interest to seek suspension of execution, so the claim was declared inadmissible.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an urgent appeal challenging removal of a caveat, holding that provisional measures are not res judicata and may be revisited for new circumstances.
The Court of Appeal provisionally stayed execution of a foreign judgment previously granted exequatur, finding urgency and that the underlying judgment was still being litigated abroad.
The Court of Appeal held that provisional Belgian family orders could not be enforced in Rwanda, because exequatur requires a final foreign judgment.
The Court of Appeal held that urgent interlocutory orders are provisional and may be revisited, and that attachment of property must be proportionate to claimed damages.
The Supreme Court held that a caveat on a shareholder’s personal property for company tax debts was unlawful without a court ruling on personal liability.
The Supreme Court held that a shareholder’s property could not be provisionally attached for a company’s tax debt without a prior court finding of personal liability.
Explore more
