Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial law RLR V.4-2025

VINTAGES WINES AND LIQUORS Ltd v. KARASIRA

The Court of Appeal held that Nzamukosha Sylvie had a direct and personal interest to intervene but her claims were new and inadmissible at the appellate stage. The court found that the statutory suspension of creditor enforcement under insolvency law only applies if a liquidation order is made within six months; otherwise, creditors regain enforcement rights. Since no liquidation order was made within the statutory period, the auction was lawful. The appeal by Vintages Wines and Liquors Ltd lacked merit and was dismissed. Legal costs were awarded to the respondents.

  • Liquidation proceedings
  • Foreclosure and auction of collateral
  • Standing to intervene
  • New claims on appeal
  • Creditor rights during insolvency
  • Award of legal costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RCA00078/2022/HC/RWG

GAHAMANYI v UMUHOZA N’UNDI

The High Court held that an absent party’s appeal time runs from notice of judgment, not the judgment date, and set aside a mutation order made without jurisdiction.

  • Appeal timelines
  • Mutation of property
  • Standing to intervene
  • Jurisdiction
  • Contract validity
  • Appeal-timelines
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RCA00078/2022/HC/RWG

Gahamanyi v Muhoza

The High Court held the appeal was timely because the appellant had been absent at trial, but set aside the lower judgment for lack of jurisdiction and dismissed the claim.

  • Appeal deadlines
  • Mutation of property
  • Standing to intervene
  • Jurisdiction
  • Contract validity
  • Appeal-deadlines
Read case analysis
Family law RCA 00018/2022/HC/MUS

MUSONI N’UNDI V MUGABUSHAKA N’ABANDI

The High Court held Musoni Evariste’s appeal was timely, set aside the lower court judgment, dismissed a proposed intervention, and awarded costs.

  • Appeal period calculation
  • Succession dispute
  • Standing to intervene
  • Effect of family meeting decisions
  • Compensation of legal costs
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis
Commercial law RLR V.1-2022

UBURIYEMUYE v HOME BASKET SACCO KIMIRONKO N’UNDI

The Supreme Court held that a purchaser at auction could intervene, but the High Commercial Court lacked jurisdiction over auction-procedure disputes.

  • Mandate vs. service contract
  • Standing to intervene
  • Execution of judgments
  • Auction procedure
  • Jurisdiction
  • Damages and costs
Read case analysis
Commercial law RLR V.1 -2023

UBURIYEMUYE v HOME BASKET SACCO KIMIRONKO N’UNDI

The Supreme Court held that HOME BASKET SACCO could intervene, but that the High Commercial Court lacked jurisdiction over auction-procedure disputes.

  • Mandate vs. service contract
  • Standing to intervene
  • Execution of judgments
  • Auction procedure
  • Jurisdiction of commercial courts
  • Commercial-procedure
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RS/INJUST/RC 00011/2019/SC

MUKAMUSONI v NKUNDIMANA

The Supreme Court held that Mukamusoni’s review application for injustice was inadmissible because it was filed to the wrong authority and outside the statutory time limit.

  • Review on grounds of injustice
  • Standing to intervene
  • Succession rights
  • Procedural time limits
  • Review-on-grounds-of-injustice
  • Procedural-admissibility
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOM 00001/2018/CHC/HCC

HOME BASKET SACCO v. UBURIYEMUYE N’UNDI

The Commercial High Court held that Home Basket Sacco could challenge the annulment of an auction affecting its interests, and that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the annulment case.

  • Challenge of judgment
  • Auction annulment
  • Jurisdiction
  • Standing to intervene
  • Standing
  • Auction-annulment
Read case analysis
Labour law RLR V.1-2019

RUSHOMINTWALI v. MUNYANGANZO N’UNDI_kn

The Supreme Court held that a company summoned only to give information is not treated as a party, so a shareholder was not barred from intervening.

  • Standing to intervene
  • Corporate representation in litigation
  • Shareholder rights
  • Labour contract termination
  • Damages for unfair dismissal
  • Standing-to-intervene
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.