Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil law RS/INJUST/RC 00008/2019/SC

GAHIRE v MUKARUSHAKO NA BAGENZI

The Supreme Court partly granted review for injustice, holding the disputed property was inherited land and the sale only bound the seller’s one-third share.

  • Land ownership
  • Sale of inherited property
  • Capacity to contract
  • Nullity of contracts by minors
  • Partition of inheritance
  • Procedural time limits
Read case analysis
Civil law RCA 00271/2018/HC/KIG

Batamuriza v Twagiramariya n'abandi

The High Court held that the appeal was well founded, upheld the sale agreement, and ordered mutation of the house into Batamuriza's name on payment of the balance.

  • Capacity to contract
  • Mutation of property
  • Representation by advocate
  • Effect of judicial interdiction
  • Validity of sale agreements
  • Succession rights
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RLR V.3-2017

MUKARUSHAKIRO N’ABANDI v. GAHIRE_302029_kn

The Supreme Court held it had jurisdiction over two appeals because the amount in dispute exceeded the statutory threshold, but rejected a late appeal by applying appeal-time rules.

  • Appellate jurisdiction
  • Limitation periods
  • Rectification of judgments
  • Capacity to contract
  • Burden of proof
  • Appellate-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Civil law RLR V.3-2017

MUKARUSHAKIRO ET AL v. GAHIRE_302029_en

The Supreme Court held that a mistaken legal reference did not negate jurisdiction, but it rejected Mukangenzi Céline’s appeal as out of time.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Appellate procedure
  • Statute of limitation
  • Rectification of judgment
  • Capacity to contract
  • Damages
Read case analysis
Contract law RCOMA 0053/12/CS

BPR LTD v. NTAMPAKA

The loan agreement between BPR Ltd and Ntampaka Janvier is void because Ntampaka was a minor and not properly emancipated at the time of contracting. However, the guarantee contract signed by Kayigaba Eric is valid and enforceable because the incapacity of the principal debtor does not affect the guarantor's obligation if the guarantor had capacity. No damages are awarded to the respondents as they did not demonstrate actual harm.

  • Capacity to contract
  • Loan agreements
  • Guarantee contracts
  • Minority and emancipation
  • Damages
Read case analysis
Contracts law RCOMA 0205/14/HCC

GASHONGORE v. EWASA

The Commercial High Court allowed Gashongore’s appeal, held that his children’s photos were used without valid consent, and awarded damages against EWSA and Image Media.

  • Fraudulent misrepresentation
  • Capacity to contract
  • Validity of consent
  • Testimonial evidence
  • Moral damages
  • Privacy rights of children
Read case analysis
Contract law RCOMAA 0007/12/CS

MUGENZI v. BPR

The Supreme Court held that BPR’s Kicukiro branch had capacity to contract after fusion, upheld the loan’s validity, and confirmed damages and costs against Mugenzi.

  • Capacity to contract
  • Validity of contracts
  • Corporate restructuring (fusion)
  • Damages for frivolous litigation
  • Costs and attorney fees
  • Contract-validity
Read case analysis
Contract law RCOMAA 0007/12/CS

MUGENZI v. BPR

The Supreme Court held that BPR’s Kicukiro branch had capacity to contract after amalgamation, upheld the loan’s validity, and dismissed Mugenzi’s appeal.

  • Validity of contract after amalgamation
  • Capacity to contract
  • Damages for unmeritorious litigation
  • Counterclaims in civil procedure
  • Contract-validity
  • Capacity-to-contract
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMAA 0003/13/CS

NZABAMWITA N’ABANDI v. STIPPAG RWANDA

The Supreme Court held that the contract was valid, finding the appellants contracted personally and that any defect could not be used to annul it after performance.

  • Validity of contracts
  • Capacity to contract
  • Arbitration agreements
  • Corporate personality
  • Contract-validity
  • Capacity-to-contract
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMAA 0003/13/CS

NZABAMWITA ET AL v. STIPPAG RWANDA

The Supreme Court held that the appellants contracted as individuals, not as a company, and that execution of the contract barred cancellation for error. The arbitration award was confirmed.

  • Capacity to contract
  • Contract validity
  • Arbitration clause
  • Business name vs company
  • Confirmation of contract
  • Commercial-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.