Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law RS/INJUST/RP 00004/2024/SC

UBUSHINJACYAHA v UWIZEYIMANA N’ABANDI

The Supreme Court found that Muhire Jean Claude knowingly prepared and signed false valuation reports, Rukundo Rwigemera Prosper facilitated and participated in the forgery and solicited/received a bribe, and Uwizeyimana Marcelline gave a bribe to obtain a loan. The evidence, including witness testimony and documentary proof, established all elements of the offenses. The court applied the more lenient sentencing provisions and ordered all three to jointly compensate GT Bank for losses.

  • Forgery
  • Corruption
  • Criminal procedure
  • Sentencing
  • Damages
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA/ECON 00175/2024/HC/KIG

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MAJYAMBERE

The High Court upheld a bribery conviction, holding that a single credible witness can suffice and that an unsigned seizure report does not invalidate the evidence.

  • Corruption
  • Evidence
  • Appeals
  • Sentencing
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA/ECON 00175/2024/HC/KIG

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MAJYAMBERE

The High Court upheld a bribery conviction, holding that a single credible witness can suffice and an unsigned seizure report does not nullify evidence.

Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA/ECON00038/2023/HC/KIG

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NZABAMWITA

The High Court recharacterized the offence from bribery to fraudulently obtaining another’s property, reduced the sentence to three years, and ordered release.

  • Change of charge
  • Fraud
  • Corruption
  • Sentencing
  • Change-of-charge
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law RS/INJUST/RP 00001/2020/SC

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MAGARA GAHAKWA N’ABANDI

The Supreme Court held that Kamanzi Charlotte and Magara Gahakwa John, having acted to assist authorities and provided key information, are acquitted under whistleblower protection. The remaining defendants, having been convicted of related crimes (embezzlement, corruption), must jointly pay full restitution to SONARWA, regardless of the absence of a civil claim, as the law allows restitution in criminal cases. The amount is based on the internal audit, which was not effectively rebutted.

  • Embezzlement
  • Corruption
  • Joint liability
  • Restitution
  • Miscarriage of justice
  • Internal audit evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law RLR V.3-2023

PROSECUTION v MAGARA ET AL.

The Supreme Court held that only parties who applied for review due to injustice may seek changes, unless indivisibility is shown; incidental applications were inadmissible.

  • Judgment review
  • Injustice
  • Incidental applications
  • Embezzlement
  • Corruption
  • False documents
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.