KARUMUHINZI BAUDOUX vs NYIRAKAZIGA
The applicant failed to prove ownership of the disputed land or that the sale was fraudulent. The sale contract remains valid. Damages for distress cannot be considered as they were not raised in the original proceedings. Costs and attorney fees are awarded to the respondent in a reduced amount due to lack of substantiation for higher sums.
Source excerpt
- Ownership of immovable property
- Nullity of sale contracts
- Action en revendication
- Burden of proof
- Review for injustice
- Damages