AYINKAMIYE v KASINE NâABANDI
The Court of Appeal found that Acte de notoriĂ©tĂ© No 79/86 and similar documents did not meet statutory requirements and thus had no legal value, but this did not affect the outcome because other evidence, including the purchase agreement and consistent testimony of all siblings except the applicant, established that the disputed land (UPI:1/03/02/04/301) belonged to Mukangenzi ClĂ©mence and Rukira Isidore, not the parents. The land registration certificate in the parents' names was obtained irregularly and could be set aside. The settlement agreement of 04/05/2024 was binding except for the diâŠ
Source excerpt
- Succession
- Land registration
- Evidence
- Acte de notoriété
- Partition of inheritance
- Burden of proof