UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUBARAKA N’UNDI
The alleged sentencing disparity is not a new fact as defined by Article 197 of Law NÂş 027/2019. It does not constitute conclusive new evidence that was unavailable during the original proceedings and cannot serve as a ground for review. The application does not meet the legal requirements for admission.
Source excerpt
- Review of judgment
- New evidence
- Sentencing disparity
- Drug offences