Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal held that the workers were casual employees, not permanent staff, but ordered the employer to pay outstanding social security contributions and issue employment certificates.
Applicants were not permanent employees but casual workers under fixed-term, hourly contracts; no evidence of unlawful dismissal was established; thus, no damages are due. However, the employer must pay any outstanding social security contributions and issue work certificates to applicants who have not received them.
Source excerpt
The Supreme Court partially allowed review in a labour dispute, refusing unfair-dismissal damages but ordering Hayton Ltd to pay social security contributions and fees.
The Supreme Court found Mount Meru liable in part for unlawful dismissal and occupational-accident related losses after failing to register the worker with social security.
The Court of Appeal held Nishimwe Françoise was a casual worker, not a permanent employee, but ordered Horizon Construction Ltd to pay unpaid social security contributions and costs.
The High Court held that RSSB’s silence did not amount to granting EPR’s request, and EPR used the wrong procedure to challenge the contribution demand.
The Supreme Court found the worker had not proved regular six-month employment, rejecting illegal-dismissal damages but ordering social security contributions and partial fees.
The Supreme Court held that Uwizeyimana failed to prove six continuous months of regular employment, so unlawful dismissal was not established, but social security contributions were still due.
The Supreme Court held that the claimant did not prove six continuous months of work to qualify as a permanent employee, but social security contributions were still due.
The Supreme Court held that the applicant did not prove continuous six-month employment, so he was not unlawfully dismissed, but social security contributions were still due.
Explore more
