ALBERT SUPPLY RWANDA Ltd v. GMK ARCHITECTURE Ltd
The appeal lacked merit because the urgent application met the legal criteria for urgency: GMK ARCHITECTURE Ltd faced a real risk of losing the only available asset for recovery if Rwanda Housing Authority paid ALBERT SUPPLY RWANDA Ltd before the main claim was decided. The court confirmed that urgent applications are not to be decided based on the merits of the main claim, and contractual dispute resolution mechanisms do not bar urgent interim relief when risk of irreparable harm is shown.
Source excerpt
- Urgent applications
- Contract enforcement
- Interim relief
- Supervision agreements