Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The applicant's alleged new evidence (trial transcript) is not new, as he was present and signed it at trial. The grounds do not meet the statutory requirements for review. The application is inadmissible.
Source excerpt
The Supreme Court of Rwanda dismissed BCR Ltd’s appeal and Ngirumpatse Pascal’s cross-appeal, holding that the lower court had not ruled beyond the pleadings and that surety liability remained.
The Supreme Court held that the commercial court did not act ultra petita, BCR had the burden of proof, and the debt restructuring agreement remained binding.
The Supreme Court upheld most of the commercial appeal, finding no ultra petita ruling, enforcing the debt restructuring agreement, and barring repeat interest claims.
The Supreme Court of Rwanda rejected BCR’s main appeal and partly allowed the cross-appeal on fees, holding the lower court had not gone ultra petita and that the restructuring agreement bound the parties.
Rwanda Supreme Court upheld the main appeal dismissal in a commercial debt dispute, finding no ultra petita ruling and enforcing the parties’ restructuring agreement.
Explore more
