MUHONGANSEKO v IYAKAREMYE
The court found sufficient evidence that the parties cohabited as husband and wife and jointly owned the property registered under both names. Therefore, the property must be divided equally. The lower court's decision on property division was overturned, but its finding on lack of jurisdiction for child maintenance was upheld.
Source excerpt
- Cohabitation
- Division of property
- Child maintenance
- Unmarried couples' rights