Sign in
Scotland Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Scotland Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Scotland decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2024] ScotHC HCJAC_5

NOTE OF APPEAL BY CAROL McCRONE AGAINST HMA

NOTE OF APPEAL BY CAROL McCRONE AGAINST HMA [2024] ScotHC HCJAC_5 (17 February 2023)

The Appeal Court held that traffic officers lawfully stopped the appellant’s car under road traffic powers, and that the later drugs detention was lawful. The appeal was refused.

  • Detention
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Police powers
  • Road traffic offences
  • Criminal-appeal
  • Drug-searches
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2022] ScotHC HCJAC_18

APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY NATALIE McGARRY

APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY NATALIE McGARRY [2022] ScotHC HCJAC_18 (16 May 2022)

The Appeal Court of the High Court of Justiciary allowed Natalie McGarry’s appeal, holding that her guilty pleas were tendered in clearly prejudicial circumstances.

  • Withdrawal of guilty plea
  • Miscarriage of justice
  • Legal representation
  • Mental health in criminal proceedings
  • Withdrawal-of-guilty-plea
  • Miscarriage-of-justice
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] ScotHC HCJAC_26

APPEAL BY HMA AGAINST JONATHAN RICHARD PORTER

APPEAL BY HMA AGAINST JONATHAN RICHARD PORTER [2023] ScotHC HCJAC_26 (10 December 2021)

The Appeal Court allowed the Crown’s appeal after finding that an incorrectly described anonymous witness could be identified and that the defect was curable by amendment.

  • Witness anonymity
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Designation of witnesses
  • Amendment of indictment
  • Witness-anonymity
  • Criminal-procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2021] ScotHC HCJAC_24

BILL OF ADVOCATION BY JAMES RUSSELL AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE

BILL OF ADVOCATION BY JAMES RUSSELL AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2021] ScotHC HCJAC_24 (24 March 2021)

The High Court held that a sheriff may review a refused bail decision after an unsuccessful appeal, unless the appeal court substituted its own bail decision.

  • Bail
  • Appeals
  • Review of bail decisions
  • Criminal-procedure
  • Bail-review
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2018] ScotHC HCJAC_2

HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE, APPEAL BY AGAINST AD

HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE, APPEAL BY AGAINST AD [2018] ScotHC HCJAC_2 (09 January 2018)

The Appeal Court held that time-barred sexual offence allegations could be placed in a docket for evidential purposes, despite section 65, and allowed the Crown appeal.

  • Time-barred offences
  • Docket procedure
  • Sexual offences
  • Mutual corroboration
  • Fair trial
  • Oppression
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_68

BK, APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY v HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE

BK, APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY v HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_68 (13 September 2017))

The appeal court allowed BK’s appeal against conviction, holding that defective representation denied him a fair trial by failing to present a key defence and obtain supporting records.

  • Defective legal representation
  • Sexual offences against children
  • Disclosure of records
  • Fair trial rights
  • Defective-representation
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_46

Whitehouse & Anor v HM Advocate

Whitehouse & Anor v HM Advocate [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_46 (22 June 2017)

The Appeal Court refused appeals against a three-month extension of time limits for a complex Rangers-related prosecution under section 65 of the 1995 Act.

  • Extension of time limits
  • Preliminary hearing
  • Indictment
  • Public interest
  • Complexity of proceedings
  • Criminal-procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_28

JPB v HM Advocate

JPB v HM Advocate [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_28 (19 May 2017)

The Appeal Court upheld an extension of the statutory time bar in a criminal case, holding that the trial judge had properly exercised discretion despite delays in citing a complainer.

  • Extension of time bar
  • Desertion pro loco et tempore
  • Citation of witnesses
  • Judicial discretion
  • Criminal-procedure
  • Time-bar-extension
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_17

RW v HM Advocate

RW v HM Advocate [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_17 (20 March 2017)

The Appeal Court set aside a sheriff’s ex proprio motu adjournment and time-bar extension, saying the full case history and delay caused by the Crown were not properly weighed.

  • Adjournment of trial
  • Extension of statutory time bar
  • Judicial discretion
  • Historical sexual offences
  • Vulnerable witness evidence
  • Criminal-procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_113

Bennett McGuire v HM Advocate

Bennett McGuire v HM Advocate [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_113 (23 November 2016)

The Appeal Court upheld a prosecution time extension, holding there was sufficient reason due to extensive forensic work and that the judge properly exercised discretion.

  • Extension of time
  • Forensic evidence
  • Judicial discretion
  • Criminal-procedure
  • Extension-of-time
  • Forensic-evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Scotland decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.