Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Scotland decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Judicial review of a council decision granting section 42 planning permission for a supermarket at Cuckoo Bridge Retail Park refused.
APPEAL BY TAYLOR WIMPEY UK LTD AGAINST THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS [2023] ScotCS CSIH_2 (20 January 2023)
The Inner House refused Taylor Wimpey’s appeal against refusal of planning permission for a housing scheme at Planetreeyetts Farm in Kilmacolm.
APPEAL BY NORTH LANARKSHIRE BIOPOWER LTD AGAINST THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS [2021] ScotCS CSIH_47 (14 September 2021)
The Court of Session refused a planning appeal, holding that only the reasons in the final decision letter were legally relevant and not earlier ministerial thinking.
CITY OF EDINBURGH COUNCIL AGAINST THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS AND (FIRST) GRANTON DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND (SECOND) LESTER GIBBONS [2020] ScotCS CSIH_13 (09 April 2020)
The Inner House refused a planning appeal over a section 42 application, upholding an extension of time for a Granton Harbour outline permission.
LOCH HILL WINDFARM (SCOTLAND) Ltd AGAINST A DECISION OF THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS [2015] ScotCS CSIH_37 (15 May 2015)
The Inner House refused Loch Hill Windfarm’s appeal, holding the reporter lawfully found cumulative visual impact made the proposal contrary to the development plan.
Jermon Ltd, Re Application for Judicial Review [2008] ScotCS CSOH_76 (21 May 2008)
The Court of Session reduced planning permissions granted by West Dunbartonshire Council after finding defective reasoning and a failure to follow notification procedures.
Aberdeenshire Council v. Scottish Ministers [2008] ScotCS CSIH_28 (28 March 2008)
The Court of Session quashed a planning appeal decision, holding the reporter gave inadequate reasons, misapplied housing land supply policy, and imposed an unenforceable affordable housing condition.
LIDL UK GmbH v The Scottish Ministers & Anor [2006] ScotCS CSOH_165 (18 October 2006)
The Court of Session allowed Lidl’s appeal, holding that the Reporter erred on the planning policy test and reached an irrational conclusion on the facts.
City Of Edinburgh Council v Decision Of Scottish Ministers & Anor [2001] ScotCS 121 (24 May 2001)
The Court of Session held that Policy L5 could not properly be read as covering a Class 3 restaurant, so the reporter had misinterpreted the development plan.
Explore more
