Sign in
Scotland Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Scotland Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Scotland decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2025] HCJAC 13

Appeal against Conviction by Peter McGuiness against HMA (High Court of Justiciary)

Appeal against Conviction by Peter McGuiness against HMA (High Court of Justiciary) [2025] HCJAC 13 (21 February 2025)

The Appeal Court held that distress observed nine years after a sexual offence was too remote to corroborate the complainer’s evidence, and quashed the conviction on charge 2.

  • Corroboration
  • Sexual offences
  • Hearsay
  • Evidence of distress
  • De recenti statements
  • Sexual-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_3

Wilson v HM Advocate

Wilson v HM Advocate [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_3 (19 January 2017)

Appeal against conviction refused in a sexual offence case. The court held that evidence of the complainer’s distress could corroborate lack of consent.

  • Sexual offences
  • Corroboration
  • Evidence of distress
  • Jury directions
  • Hearsay
  • Sexual-offences
Read case analysis
Date unavailable
Criminal law [1999] ScotHC 172

PAUL CULLINGTON v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE

PAUL CULLINGTON v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [1999] ScotHC 172 (25th June, 1999)

Evidence of distress may corroborate lack of consent and use of force in indecent assault cases; the sheriff's directions were consistent with the law as clarified in Smith v. Lees.

  • Indecent assault
  • Corroboration
  • Evidence of distress
  • Lack of consent
Read case analysis
Date unavailable
Criminal law [2000] ScotHC 21

ALEXANDER FORSYTH v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE

ALEXANDER FORSYTH v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2000] ScotHC 21 (22nd February, 2000)

The court held that there is no principled distinction between alternative explanations for distress coming from the complainer or other witnesses. The jury was entitled to find that the complainer's distress, as corroborated by other witnesses, related to the rape, and there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction.

  • Rape
  • Corroboration
  • Evidence of distress
  • Jury directions
Read case analysis
Date unavailable
Criminal law [2001] ScotHC 3

DAVID ALEXANDER KERR v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE

DAVID ALEXANDER KERR v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2001] ScotHC 3 (1st February, 2001)

The court held that the trial judge's directions, when read as a whole, did not mislead the jury regarding the corroborative value of distress and that there was ample evidence, including the tape recording and the complainer's distress, to corroborate the essential elements of the charge. The appeal was therefore refused.

  • Corroboration
  • Indecent assault
  • Jury directions
  • Evidence of distress
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Scotland decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.