Sign in
Scotland Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Scotland Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Scotland decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2025] HCAC 20

Appeal Against Conviction by Barry Marshall (High Court of Justiciary)

Appeal Against Conviction by Barry Marshall (High Court of Justiciary) [2025] HCAC 20 (29 April 2025)

The Appeal Court refused Barry Marshall’s conviction appeal, holding that proposed fresh evidence about another man’s alleged confession was inadmissible hearsay and not significant enough.

  • Fresh evidence
  • Hearsay
  • Identification
  • Miscarriage of justice
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Admissibility of evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2018] ScotHC HCJAC_14

HDJS, APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE

HDJS, APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2018] ScotHC HCJAC_14 (30 January 2018)

Appeal against conviction in sexual offences and indecent images case refused. The court upheld the trial judge’s refusal to let the jury re-examine selected productions during deliberations.

  • Sexual offences
  • Evidence
  • Jury directions
  • Identification
  • Criminal-law
  • Sexual-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2018] ScotHC HCJAC_16

INGRAM, APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE

INGRAM, APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY AGAINST HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2018] ScotHC HCJAC_16 (25 January 2018)

The Appeal Court refused Stephen Ingram’s appeal against conviction, holding that circumstantial evidence was sufficient to prove both the assault and identification.

  • Assault
  • Threatening or abusive behaviour
  • Sufficiency of evidence
  • Identification
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_59

GUBINAS & Anor v HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE, NOTE OF APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY

GUBINAS & Anor v HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE, NOTE OF APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION BY [2017] ScotHC HCJAC_59 (08 August 2017))

The court held that, once video provenance is proved, jurors may assess what the images show and may use them to determine events and identity.

  • Video evidence
  • Jury directions
  • Identification
  • Sexual offences
  • Real evidence
  • Video-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_70

Wilson v HM Advocate

Wilson v HM Advocate [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_70 (23 August 2016)

The Appeal Court upheld James Wilson’s conviction for extortion, holding that circumstantial evidence and corroboration were sufficient on charge 1.

  • Sufficiency of evidence
  • Mutual corroboration
  • Identification
  • Extortion
  • Sufficiency-of-evidence
  • Mutual-corroboration
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_33

Laing v HM Advocate

Laing v HM Advocate [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_33 (11 April 2016)

The appeal court refused Brian Laing’s conviction appeal, holding that DNA on broken glass, recent injuries, and other circumstances were enough to identify him as the perpetrator.

  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Corroboration
  • Dna evidence
  • Identification
  • Circumstantial-evidence
  • Dna-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2014] ScotHC HCJAC_137

O'Shea v Procurator Fical, Paisley

O'Shea v Procurator Fical, Paisley [2014] ScotHC HCJAC_137 (19 December 2014)

Scottish appeal on whether a witness’s account of Margaret Rooney’s remarks was part of the res gestae and could corroborate identification.

  • Res gestae
  • Hearsay
  • Corroboration
  • Identification
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Res-gestae
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2014] ScotHC HCJAC_136

O'Shea & HM Advocate

O'Shea & HM Advocate [2014] ScotHC HCJAC_136 (16 December 2014)

The Appeal Court upheld Christopher O’Shea’s conviction, holding that Margaret Rooney’s spontaneous remarks could be treated as res gestae and used for corroboration.

  • Res gestae
  • Hearsay
  • Corroboration
  • Identification
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Res-gestae
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2014] ScotHC HCJAC_83

BOWES v PF GREENOCK

BOWES v PF GREENOCK [2014] ScotHC HCJAC_83 (24 July 2014)

The High Court of Justiciary Appeal Court refused John Bowes’s appeal, holding that the complainer’s identification of him as the assailant was sufficiently corroborated.

  • Identification
  • Corroboration
  • Assault
  • Criminal-law
  • Voice-identification
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2012] ScotHC HCJAC_113

Smart v Procurator Fiscal, Paisley

Smart v Procurator Fiscal, Paisley [2012] ScotHC HCJAC_113 (08 August 2012)

The Appeal Court held that DNA on an envelope seal, together with other circumstances, was enough to infer that the appellant sent a threatening card.

  • Threats
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Dna evidence
  • Identification
  • Circumstantial-evidence
  • Dna-evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Scotland decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.