Sign in
Scotland Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Scotland Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Scotland decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2025] HCJAC 8

Note of appeal by Pa Samba Saye against HMA (High Court of Justiciary)

Note of appeal by Pa Samba Saye against HMA (High Court of Justiciary) [2025] HCJAC 8 (25 July 2024)

The Appeal Court upheld a ruling excluding evidence about alleged sexual activity with third parties in a rape trial where the accused admitted intercourse but relied on consent.

  • Rape
  • Consent
  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Special defence of incrimination
  • Section 275 applications
  • Admissibility-of-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_26

Sinclair v HM Advocate

Sinclair v HM Advocate [2016] ScotHC HCJAC_26 (24 March 2016)

The Appeal Court held that any disclosure failure about an incriminee’s address caused no miscarriage of justice because the defence made no real attempt to investigate.

  • Disclosure obligations
  • Special defence of incrimination
  • Fair trial rights
  • Misuse of drugs act offences
  • Criminal-procedure
  • Disclosure-obligations
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2014] ScotHC HCJAC_28

DAVID RONALD SHANKS HUNTER v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE

DAVID RONALD SHANKS HUNTER v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2014] ScotHC HCJAC_28 (12 March 2014)

The High Court of Justiciary refused an appeal against conviction, holding that the jury directions on mixed statements were adequate and any error about an exculpatory denial was immaterial.

  • Misdirection
  • Mixed statements
  • Identification evidence
  • Robbery
  • Special defence of incrimination
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2011] ScotHC HCJAC_81

Flanagan v. Her Majesty's Advocate

Flanagan v. Her Majesty's Advocate [2011] ScotHC HCJAC_81 (23 August 2011)

The appeal court refused a conviction appeal in a cocaine supply case, holding that the jury charge as a whole adequately covered reasonable doubt despite no specific incrimination direction.

  • Misdirection
  • Special defence of incrimination
  • Drug offences
  • Jury directions
  • Criminal-appeal
  • Jury-directions
Read case analysis
Date unavailable
Criminal law [2001] ScotHC 6

PAMELA ANN GOURLAY v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE

PAMELA ANN GOURLAY v. HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE [2001] ScotHC 6 (16th February, 2001)

The court held that while the number of judicial interventions was higher than desirable, they were aimed at clarifying the evidence and did not materially prejudice the appellant's case. The judge's charge, including the treatment of Peter Cumming's evidence, was balanced and did not give rise to any real risk of prejudice or miscarriage of justice. The appeal was therefore refused.

  • Murder
  • Assault
  • Robbery
  • Judicial conduct
  • Jury directions
  • Special defence of incrimination
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Scotland decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.