Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Seychelles decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Rosebelle (Pty) Ltd v Remoto ((SCA 13/2025) [2025] (Arising in MA 164/2024) (15 December 2025)) [2025] SCCA 37 (15 December 2025)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal as abandoned after finding the appellant filed heads of argument out of time and failed to seek an extension.
Ernesta v R ([2024] (15 December 2025) SCA CR 08/2025 (Arising in CR 52/2021)) [2025] SCCA 26 (15 December 2025)
The Court of Appeal dismissed Patrick Ernesta’s appeal as abandoned after he failed to show sufficient cause for late filing of heads of argument.
Gamatis and Another v Bank of Baroda and Another (SCA MA 04/2025 [2025] (20 August 2025)) [2025] SCCA 21 (20 August 2025)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an urgent stay application, holding the supporting affidavit was fatally defective and, alternatively, that the stay test was not met.
Pauline v Freminot ((Civil Appeal SCA 06/2025) [2025] (Arising in MA 238/2021 out of DV159/2016 SCSC 328)) [2025] SCCA 20 (18 August 2025)
A Seychelles Court of Appeal matrimonial-property appeal was settled by consent, with the Supreme Court order varied to let the appellant buy out the respondent’s share.
Seychelles Trading Company v Balthilde (MC 2 of 2025) [2025] SCSC 55 (8 April 2025)
The Supreme Court of Seychelles dismissed an application for extension of time to appeal after the judgment had already been executed and the debt paid.
Pauline v Guichard (CA 23 of 2023) [2025] SCSC 74 (14 March 2025)
The Supreme Court upheld liability for assault under Seychelles delict law, maintained damages for injuries and moral harm, but quashed the unsupported loss-of-earnings award.
MUA Limited v Mazu (PTY) Ltd (MA 243 of 2023 (arising from CA 20 of 2022)) [2025] SCSC 22 (12 February 2025)
The memorandum of appeal filed by the applicant was invalid as it lacked a prayer for relief, a mandatory requirement under rule 12. Since the memorandum was fundamentally defective and the time for filing a valid memorandum had lapsed, the defect could not be cured by amendment. The appeal was deemed withdrawn by operation of rule 14, and thus the application to amend did not arise for determination.
Source excerpt
Diving Cruises v Ally (CA 17 of 2023) [2024] SCSC 227 (24 October 2024)
The Supreme Court struck out an employment appeal because the memorandum of appeal did not comply with the mandatory rule requiring concise, numbered grounds.
Wadugodapitiya v R ((SCA CR 19/2023) [2024] (Arising in CO 29/2023) (19 August 2024)) [2024] SCCA 19 (19 August 2024)
The Court of Appeal of Seychelles dismissed an appeal against a murder conviction, holding there was no evidential basis for self-defence or provocation.
Shield Security v Dubignon (MC 90 of 2023) [2024] SCSC 16 (21 March 2024)
The Supreme Court dismissed an out-of-time appeal application and a stay request because the supporting affidavit was defective and no notice of appeal had been filed.
Explore more
