Cafrine v R ((SCA CR 14/24)
Cafrine v R ((SCA CR 14/24) [2024] SCCA (18 December 2024) (Arising in [2023] CR 42/2023)) [2024] SCCA 29 (18 December 2024)
The appeal is dismissed because the lengthy summing up, while not ideal, did not deprive the jury of their ability to deliberate or render the conviction unsafe. There is no evidence of jury fatigue or coercion. The trial judge's comments were within legal bounds and did not usurp the jury's role. The evidence against the appellant was overwhelming, and the conviction for murder, including by omission, is supported. Procedural irregularities in the appeal process did not result in a miscarriage of justice.
Source excerpt
- Murder
- Jury trial
- Summing up
- Fair trial
- Omission as actus reus
- Child protection