Pointe v Payet (MA 29/2025 (Arising in DV 16/2024))
Pointe v Payet (MA 29/2025 (Arising in DV 16/2024)) [2025] SCSC 107 (13 August 2025)
The applicant failed to satisfy all conditions for an inhibition order over all parcels sought, as most are either company-owned (separate legal personality) or encumbered by charges, negating risk of alienation. However, the applicant established an arguable case and possible beneficial interest in certain parcels registered in the respondent's name, justifying inhibition over those specific properties pending final determination.
Source excerpt
- Matrimonial property
- Inhibition orders
- Corporate personality
- Constructive trusts