Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Singapore decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal held that permission was not required to appeal a confidentiality order, granted interim sealing of the appeal file, and dismissed a strike-out application.
Court of Appeal dismissed an application to adduce two fresh expert reports on appeal, holding the reports immaterial and noting the case involved impermissible expert shopping.
The court held that documents used only for a Hadkinson objection did not require Ladd v Marshall leave, and it dismissed a late strike-out application for want of time.
The Court of Appeal held that an order under s 244 IRDA is final, not interlocutory, so permission to appeal was not required. It also treated the committal orders as final.
The Appellate Division dismissed a wife's application for permission to appeal over child care, control, and relocation orders, finding no prima facie error of law.
Leave to appeal was refused because the case had already been heard by a three-judge High Court bench and the applicant’s points were fact-sensitive, not exceptional.
The High Court refused an extension of time to serve a notice of appeal, finding the proposed appeal hopeless because it chiefly challenged factual findings on a will’s validity.
The High Court refused an extension of time to seek leave to appeal, struck out the leave application, and held that interlocutory appeal requirements were not met.
Explore more
