Sign in
Singapore Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Singapore Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Singapore decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law [2026] SGFC 69

YDO v YDP

The Family Court granted a time-limited PPO for a child after finding severe verbal abuse by the mother, and dismissed the mother’s cross-application.

  • Personal protection order
  • Emotional or psychological abuse
  • Necessity
  • Contextualised objective approach
  • Rehabilitation and counselling orders
  • Personal-protection-order
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] SGFC 53

YBQ v YBR

The Family Court awarded the mother sole custody and care of three children after finding serious past physical abuse by the father, and ordered psychological assessment before any resumed access.

  • Sole custody
  • Supervised access
  • Psychological assessment
  • Spousal maintenance
  • Child maintenance
  • Single‑income marriage
Read case analysis
Family law [2026] SGFC 31

XZU v XZV

The Family Court dismissed a mother’s PPO application for her daughter, finding the alleged incidents did not amount to family violence and a PPO was unnecessary.

  • Personal protection order
  • Family violence
  • Emotional and psychological abuse
  • Necessity requirement
  • Burden of proof
  • Personal-protection-order
Read case analysis
Children and young persons act [2026] SGYC 1

Father of XZM and Child Protector

On the material before the Court (complaint, social report and oral submissions) a prima facie case was established that the infant was in need of care and protection under s5(1)(g) read with s5(2)(f) CYPA due to risk of exposure to domestic violence; therefore interim orders committing the child to temporary hospital care until the family conference and thereafter to identified Fit Persons, together with conditions on parental contact, supervised decision-making, disclosure of professional reports and bonds for compliance, were in the child’s best interests and were justified; allegations un…

  • Care and protection orders
  • Interim orders
  • Domestic violence
  • Foster care
  • Parental bonds and conditions
Read case analysis
Family law [2025] SGFC 135

XWB v XWC

The Family Court dismissed PPO applications by a mother and her older child, finding the father’s conduct did not amount to emotional or psychological abuse under s 58B.

  • Personal protection order
  • Emotional and psychological abuse
  • Coercive control
  • Evidentiary rules (browne v dunn)
  • Standard of proof in family proceedings
  • Personal-protection-order
Read case analysis
Family law [2025] SGHCF 59

Father of XQD and XQE v Child Protector

The High Court dismissed a father’s appeal and upheld Care and Protection Orders for his two children, finding they had suffered emotional harm from parental conflict and violence.

  • Care and protection orders
  • Emotional and psychological abuse of children
  • Parental conflict
  • Standard of appellate review
  • Care-and-protection-orders
  • Emotional-abuse
Read case analysis
Criminal procedure and sentencing [2025] SGHC 130

ISMAIL BIN JAMALUDIN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court dismissed a sentence appeal for aggravated outrage of modesty, upholding five years’ imprisonment and six strokes of the cane despite challenges to sentencing bands and plea discount.

  • Sentencing
  • Guilty plea discount
  • Aggravated outrage of modesty (s 354(2) penal code)
  • Appeal standard for manifest excess
  • Guilty-plea-discount
  • Aggravated-outrage-of-modesty
Read case analysis
Family law [2024] SGHCF 31

WYQ v Child Protector

High Court dismissed a mother’s appeal against care-and-protection orders for her two daughters, upholding placement in places of safety for 12 months.

  • Care and protection orders
  • Place of safety
  • Emotional/psychological abuse
  • Moral danger
  • Self-harm
  • Parental unfitness
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] SGHC 171

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v RANDY ROSIGIT

The High Court increased a sentence for possession of child abuse material, adopting a Logachev-style framework based on harm and culpability rather than quantity alone.

  • Possession of child abuse material
  • Sentencing framework for s 377bk
  • Harm and culpability assessment
  • Aggravating and mitigating factors
  • Child-abuse-material
  • Sentencing-framework
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] SGHC 140

GFX v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court upheld a sentence for grievous hurt and false information, and set out a three-step framework for s 325 read with s 74B(2) of the Penal Code.

  • Grievous hurt (s325)
  • Enhanced penalties for victims below 14 (s74b)
  • Sentencing framework (bdb)
  • False information to public servant (s182)
  • Caning
  • Totality principle
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Singapore decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.