Sign in
Singapore Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Singapore Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Singapore decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Companies law

Re Jetstar Asia Airways Pte Ltd

The court sanctioned Jetstar Asia Airways Pte Ltd’s scheme of arrangement, upheld an administrative convenience class for consumer creditors, and approved a variation to the default proof-of-debt procedure.

  • Scheme of arrangement
  • Classification of creditors
  • Administrative convenience class
  • Proofs of debt
  • Variation of default procedure
  • Scheme-of-arrangement
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2026] SGHC 5

NG KUAN CHUAN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court dismissed Ng’s appeal against conviction and reduced both appellants’ fraudulent trading sentences, while leaving the SFA and MLMA sentences largely intact.

  • Fraudulent trading (companies act s340)
  • Securities and futures act offences (s82, s331)
  • Mlma pyramid selling (s3(1) read with s6(1))
  • Admissibility and weight of hearsay (evidence act s32)
  • Sentencing principles and double counting
  • In‑default penalty imprisonment
Read case analysis
Companies law [2025] SGHC 251

MM2 Asia Ltd.

The High Court granted MM2 Asia Ltd a four-month moratorium under s 64 IRDA, finding procedural compliance, good faith, and sufficient creditor support.

  • Scheme of arrangement
  • Moratorium
  • Creditor support
  • Good faith
  • Affidavit particularisation
  • Scheme-of-arrangement
Read case analysis
Companies law [2025] SGHC 176

VIVAZ GROUP HOLDINGS PTE. LTD. v TRIPLEONE (CAMBODIA) INVESTMENT PTE. LTD.

On the evidence the claimant knew of the relevant transactions at or about the material time, failed to come to court with utmost candour, pursued the application for collateral purposes and delayed unreasonably; accordingly the claimant was not acting in good faith under s 216A(3)(b) and leave to bring the derivative action was refused.

  • Statutory derivative action
  • Good faith
  • Directors' duties
  • Leave to commence derivative proceedings
  • Utmost candour and honesty
  • Delay and laches
Read case analysis
Companies law [2025] SGHC(A) 9

Thia Tiong Siong & 3 Ors v Pop Holdings Pte. Ltd.

The Appellate Division upheld deceit liability but reduced damages to nominal $1,000, and upheld oppression findings while removing discounts from the share buyout valuation.

  • Misrepresentation
  • Deceit
  • Damages assessment
  • Minority oppression
  • Buyout order
  • Discount for lack of control (dloc)
Read case analysis
Companies law [2025] SGHC 84

CANSTONE MANAGEMENT LTD v ALLESTARI DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD. & 6 Ors

The High Court struck out a minority shareholder’s originating application seeking implied constitutional terms on board appointments, holding it was an abuse of process and legally unsustainable.

  • Directors appointment
  • Implied terms in company constitution
  • Abuse of process
  • Declaratory relief
  • Minority shareholder relief
  • Interim injunction
Read case analysis
Companies law [2025] SGHC 77

ArcelorMittal Holdings AG v Liberty House Group Pte Ltd

The High Court refused a moratorium for Liberty House Group Pte Ltd, finding its scheme funding plan lacked credibility, and granted judicial management instead.

  • Judicial management order
  • Moratorium order
  • Scheme of arrangement
  • Moranda of enforcement
  • Appointment of judicial managers
  • Judicial-management
Read case analysis
Insolvency law [2025] SGHC 68

WHITE OAK TRADE FINANCE ASSETCO 1, LLC v RHODIUM INTERNATIONAL TRADING USA, INC.

The High Court dismissed an urgent application to appoint an additional liquidator, holding that the request was aimed at facilitating a U.S. deposition rather than the liquidation itself.

  • Appointment of liquidator
  • Urgent application
  • Deposition abroad
  • Duty of liquidator
  • Court supervision
  • Appointment-of-liquidator
Read case analysis
Companies law [2025] SGHC 65

Vikramathithan A/L Rasu v AK Equine Pte Ltd

The High Court granted restoration of a struck-off company and made a limitation direction so the applicant could pursue a personal injury claim.

  • Restoration of struck-off companies
  • Limitation direction under s 344g(3)
  • Causative and just requirements for limitation directions
  • Wica vs common law election
  • Prima facie meritorious claim requirement
  • Restoration-of-struck-off-companies
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] SGHC 24

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v JASON SIM CHON ANG

The High Court adopted a Logachev sentencing framework for s 76 Companies Act offences, rejected a single starting-point approach, and upheld a 12-month sentence for Sim.

  • Sentencing framework for s 76 companies act
  • Illegal financial assistance
  • Harm and culpability assessment
  • Totality principle and concurrency
  • Abetment and cheating offences
  • Whitewashing defence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Singapore decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.