Sign in
Singapore Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Singapore Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Singapore decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2020] SGCA 91

KREETHARAN S/O KATHIRESON v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court of Appeal dismissed applications to reopen criminal appeals and seek a criminal reference, holding they were abuse of process and raised no qualifying new material.

  • Conspiracy to cheat (s420 read with s109 penal code)
  • Review of appellate decisions (s394h–s394j cpc)
  • Criminal reference (s397 cpc)
  • Abuse of process and back-door appeals
  • Sentencing discount and plea mitigation
  • Standards for new evidence in review
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2020] SGCA 70

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v AISHAMUDIN BIN JAMALUDIN

The Court of Appeal held that differing common intention charges can be lawful and restored the original capital drug trafficking charge against Aishamudin bin Jamaludin.

  • Differing common intention charges
  • Prosecutorial discretion
  • Abuse of process
  • Section 34 penal code liability
  • Sentencing under s33b mda
  • Differing-common-intention-charges
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2019] SGHC 199

ARUMUGAM SELVARAJ v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court upheld a conviction for causing grievous hurt in furtherance of common intention, but reduced the sentence from 10 to 7 months' imprisonment.

  • Common intention under s 34 penal code
  • Voluntarily causing grievous hurt (s 325)
  • Joint criminal enterprise
  • Sentencing — starting point and aggravating factors
  • Appeal against sentence
  • Common-intention
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Singapore decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.