Sign in
Singapore Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Singapore Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Singapore decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2025] SGHC 69

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v TEO HWEE PENG

High Court appeal in a PCA case: Teo’s convictions on eight corruption charges were upheld, while the Prosecution’s appeal against three acquittals succeeded.

  • Prevention of corruption act s6(a) and s8 presumption
  • Witness credibility and corroboration
  • Hearsay and admissibility
  • Duplicity of charges
  • Standard of proof for untested statements (unusually convincing)
  • Prevention-of-corruption-act
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] SGHC 310

CHING HWA MING (QIN HUAMING) v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court upheld convictions for conspiring to corruptly gratify, but reduced each appellant’s sentence from 16 months to 12 months.

  • Prevention of corruption act (s5(b)(i), s2)
  • Conspiracy (abetment)
  • Admissibility of long statements/cpib statements
  • Criminal procedure code (s22, s262)
  • Sentencing frameworks (romel; goh ngak eng)
  • Corruption
Read case analysis
Arbitration [2018] SGHC 101

CHINA MACHINE NEW ENERGY CORPORATION v JAGUAR ENERGY GUATEMALA LLC & Anor

The High Court rejected a challenge to an ICC arbitral award, holding that an attorneys-eyes-only disclosure regime did not breach natural justice or public policy.

  • Attorneys-eyes-only orders
  • Natural justice
  • Setting aside arbitral awards
  • Expedited arbitration
  • Document production and confidentiality
  • Guerrilla tactics in arbitration
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2017] SGHC 37

MATHEW KOOTTAPPILLIL MATHEW v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court reduced a corruption sentence from 6 to 4 weeks after the appellant made late full compensation, while upholding the penalty.

  • Prevention of corruption act s6(a)
  • Penal code s406
  • Restitution
  • Comparative sentencing
  • Mitigation
  • Remorse
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2015] SGHC 8

Ding Si Yang v Public Prosecutor and another appeal

The High Court increased Ding Si Yang’s sentence for corruptly giving gratification to football match officials to induce match-fixing, stressing general deterrence and syndicate involvement.

  • Match‑fixing
  • Bribery
  • Prevention of corruption act s 5
  • Sentencing guidelines
  • General deterrence
  • Syndicate involvement
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2005] SGHC 123

Wong Teck Long v Public Prosecutor

The High Court upheld a corruption conviction against a banker and increased his sentence, finding the charge proper, the key witness credible, and the original punishment too lenient.

  • Charge and form of charge
  • Accomplice evidence and corroboration
  • Weight of documentary and audio evidence
  • Abuse of position in financial institutions
  • Sentencing principles and public interest
  • Corruption
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2000] SGHC 179

Fong Ser Joo William v Public Prosecutor

The High Court dismissed a police officer’s corruption appeal, holding that payments were corrupt gratification for enquiries into police investigations and that the sentence was not excessive.

  • Bribery
  • Section 6(a) prevention of corruption act
  • Objective corruption
  • Guilty knowledge
  • Undue influence by gratuities
  • Corruption
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Singapore decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.